BIPIX vs. AFBIX
BIPIX (ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund) and AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) are both mutual funds - BIPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while AFBIX is a Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, BIPIX returned 10.07%/yr vs -4.40%/yr for AFBIX. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. BIPIX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for AFBIX.
Performance
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIPIX achieves a 26.92% return, which is significantly higher than AFBIX's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BIPIX has outperformed AFBIX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while AFBIX has yielded a comparatively lower -4.40% annualized return.
BIPIX
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- 16.04%
- YTD
- 26.92%
- 6M
- 22.43%
- 1Y
- 123.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
AFBIX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- -3.79%
- 3Y*
- -4.92%
- 5Y*
- -2.03%
- 10Y*
- -4.40%
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 26.92% | 47.99% | -25.91% | 9.55% | -13.43% | 5.00% | 19.94% | 23.65% | -12.15% | 34.71% |
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -1.09% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIPIX and AFBIX is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.46 |
The correlation between BIPIX and AFBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIPIX vs. AFBIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIPIX
AFBIX
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIPIX | AFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.84 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.17 | -1.02 | +9.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.86 | -1.63 | +25.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, roughly equal to the maximum AFBIX drawdown of -82.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPIX and AFBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIPIX | AFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.51% | -82.07% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -3.69% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.50% | -17.55% | -41.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.86% | -21.51% | -42.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.86% | -36.55% | -27.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -82.05% | +82.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.17% | -57.84% | +20.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.18% | 2.59% | +2.59% |
Volatility
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) at 1.13%. This indicates that BIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIPIX | AFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.94% | 1.13% | +13.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.88% | 3.13% | +28.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.78% | 3.90% | +35.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.00% | 7.29% | +32.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.52% | 7.92% | +28.60% |
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AFBIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Dividend Comparison
BIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 0.29% | 0.37% | 0.23% | 6.69% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 12.09% | 3.26% | 5.52% | 7.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIPIX and AFBIX have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIPIX has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to AFBIX (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIPIX dropped -84.51% vs AFBIX's -82.07%.
BIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIPIX and AFBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer