BIPIX vs. AFBIX
BIPIX (ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund) and AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) are both mutual funds - BIPIX is a Leveraged Equities fund managed by ProFunds, while AFBIX is a Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, BIPIX returned 9.75%/yr vs -4.14%/yr for AFBIX. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. BIPIX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for AFBIX.
Performance
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIPIX achieves a 40.06% return, which is significantly higher than AFBIX's -1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BIPIX has outperformed AFBIX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while AFBIX has yielded a comparatively lower -4.14% annualized return.
BIPIX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 23.57%
- 6M
- 36.41%
- YTD
- 40.06%
- 1Y
- 124.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
AFBIX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- -3.66%
- 3Y*
- -4.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.05%
- 10Y*
- -4.14%
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 40.06% | 47.99% | -25.91% | 9.55% | -13.43% | 5.00% | 19.94% | 23.65% | -12.15% | 34.71% |
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -1.42% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIPIX and AFBIX is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.46 |
The correlation between BIPIX and AFBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIPIX vs. AFBIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIPIX
AFBIX
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) and Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIPIX | AFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.84 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.78 | -1.05 | +9.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.43 | -1.77 | +27.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIPIX drawdown since its inception was -84.51%, roughly equal to the maximum AFBIX drawdown of -82.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIPIX and AFBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIPIX | AFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.51% | -82.12% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.15% | -3.63% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.50% | -17.80% | -41.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.86% | -21.74% | -42.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.86% | -34.75% | -29.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | -82.11% | +74.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -57.91% | +20.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.22% | 2.42% | +2.80% |
Volatility
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Volatility Comparison
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund (BIPIX) has a higher volatility of 11.87% compared to Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) at 0.80%. This indicates that BIPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIPIX | AFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.87% | 0.80% | +11.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.89% | 3.15% | +28.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.99% | 3.85% | +36.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 7.29% | +32.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.49% | 7.89% | +28.60% |
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AFBIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIPIX vs. AFBIX - Dividend Comparison
BIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIPIX ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Fund | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.23% | 6.69% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 12.09% | 3.26% | 5.52% | 7.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIPIX and AFBIX have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIPIX has higher volatility (11.87%) compared to AFBIX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIPIX dropped -84.51% vs AFBIX's -82.12%.
BIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIPIX and AFBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer