AFBIX vs. AMAT
AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) is Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds, while AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX returned -4.09%/yr vs 37.62%/yr for AMAT. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 124.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of -4.09%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 37.62% annualized return.
AFBIX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- -3.56%
- 3Y*
- -4.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.95%
- 10Y*
- -4.09%
AMAT
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 87.74%
- YTD
- 124.45%
- 1Y
- 192.84%
- 3Y*
- 60.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.64%
- 10Y*
- 37.62%
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -1.31% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 124.45% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFBIX and AMAT is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFBIX vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
AFBIX
AMAT
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFBIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.47 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 8.33 | -9.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 23.59 | -25.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.12%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFBIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.12% | -85.22% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -23.31% | +19.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | -49.88% | +32.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -55.14% | +33.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.75% | -55.14% | +20.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.09% | -20.42% | -61.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.90% | -38.73% | -19.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 8.21% | -5.82% |
Volatility
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 0.95%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 29.63%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFBIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 29.63% | -28.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 45.92% | -42.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 55.59% | -51.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 45.73% | -38.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 43.72% | -35.83% |
Dividends
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.33% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFBIX and AMAT have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMAT has higher volatility (29.63%) compared to AFBIX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.12% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFBIX and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer