AFBIX vs. AMAT
AFBIX (Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund) is Inverse Bonds fund managed by ProFunds, while AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX returned -4.38%/yr vs 40.85%/yr for AMAT. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 149.73% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of -4.38%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 40.85% annualized return.
AFBIX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.34%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- -4.64%
- 5Y*
- -2.14%
- 10Y*
- -4.38%
AMAT
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- 48.13%
- YTD
- 149.73%
- 6M
- 147.78%
- 1Y
- 280.55%
- 3Y*
- 68.94%
- 5Y*
- 37.57%
- 10Y*
- 40.85%
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | -1.16% | -5.24% | -3.07% | -6.30% | 8.01% | -4.55% | -6.63% | -12.62% | -0.42% | -4.51% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 149.73% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between AFBIX and AMAT is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AFBIX vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
AFBIX
AMAT
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AFBIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.67 | -0.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.07 | 13.22 | -14.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 37.71 | -39.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.07%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFBIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.07% | -85.22% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.89% | -21.37% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -49.88% | +32.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | -55.14% | +33.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.55% | -55.14% | +18.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.06% | 0.00% | -82.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -38.76% | -19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 7.48% | -4.62% |
Volatility
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 1.28%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 19.60%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AFBIX | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 19.60% | -18.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 38.81% | -35.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 49.40% | -45.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.29% | 44.33% | -37.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 43.04% | -35.13% |
Dividends
AFBIX vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFBIX Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.30% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AFBIX and AMAT have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMAT has higher volatility (19.60%) compared to AFBIX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.07% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.73 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AFBIX and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer