PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFBIX vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFBIX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 149.73% return. Over the past 10 years, AFBIX has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of -4.38%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 40.85% annualized return.


AFBIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-1.34%
1Y
-4.03%
3Y*
-4.64%
5Y*
-2.14%
10Y*
-4.38%

AMAT

1D
3.74%
1M
48.13%
YTD
149.73%
6M
147.78%
1Y
280.55%
3Y*
68.94%
5Y*
37.57%
10Y*
40.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFBIX
Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund
-1.16%-5.24%-3.07%-6.30%8.01%-4.55%-6.63%-12.62%-0.42%-4.51%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
149.73%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AFBIX and AMAT is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

-0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFBIX vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFBIX
AFBIX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
AFBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
AFBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFBIXAMATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.67

-0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.07

13.22

-14.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.69

37.71

-39.39

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFBIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 5.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFBIX and AMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFBIX drawdown since its inception was -82.07%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFBIX and AMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFBIXAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.07%

-85.22%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.89%

-21.37%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-49.88%

+32.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-55.14%

+33.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.55%

-55.14%

+18.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.06%

0.00%

-82.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.83%

-38.76%

-19.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

7.48%

-4.62%

Volatility

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund (AFBIX) is 1.28%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 19.60%. This indicates that AFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFBIXAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

19.60%

-18.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

38.81%

-35.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

49.40%

-45.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

44.33%

-37.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

43.04%

-35.13%

Dividends

AFBIX vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

AFBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFBIX
Access Flex Bear High Yield ProFund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.30%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFBIX and AMAT have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAT has higher volatility (19.60%) compared to AFBIX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFBIX dropped -82.07% vs AMAT's -85.22%.

AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.73 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFBIX and AMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer