BINV vs. GMOI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BINV (Brandes International ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BINV is actively managed, while GMOI is passively managed. Over the past year, BINV returned 22.19% vs 35.21% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BINV charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.

Performance

BINV vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International ETF (BINV) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINV achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 11.52% return.

BINV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 22.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMOI

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: 11.52%
• 6M: 11.19%
• 1Y: 35.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINV vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BINV Brandes International ETF	5.17%	37.84%	-5.92%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	11.52%	45.64%	-4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BINV and GMOI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.85

The correlation between BINV and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BINV vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINV

BINV Risk / Return Rank: 46
BINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BINV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BINV Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GMOI

GMOI Risk / Return Rank: 85
GMOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GMOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
GMOI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GMOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GMOI Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINV vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International ETF (BINV) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINV	GMOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.64	-1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	3.65	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.47	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	4.23	-2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.44	16.65	-10.21

BINV vs. GMOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINV Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the GMOI Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINV and GMOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINV vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINV drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, roughly equal to the maximum GMOI drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINV and GMOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINV	GMOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-14.67%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.50%	-8.36%	-3.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.56%	-2.63%	-2.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-1.69%	-0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	2.12%	+1.33%

Volatility

BINV vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International ETF (BINV) is 3.66%, while GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that BINV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINV	GMOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	3.99%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.33%	10.67%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.99%	13.40%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.75%	15.57%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	15.57%	-0.82%

BINV vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINV vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison

BINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than GMOI's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BINV Brandes International ETF	2.08%	2.23%	2.40%	0.28%
GMOI GMO International Value ETF	2.45%	2.74%	0.54%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINV and GMOI in my portfolio?

BINV and GMOI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINV or GMOI?

GMOI has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to BINV (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINV dropped -14.91% vs GMOI's -14.67%.

Which ETF is better, BINV or GMOI?

On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 35.21% vs 22.19% for BINV. On fees, GMOI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BINV has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINV or GMOI?

Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 35.21% return vs 22.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINV or GMOI?

GMOI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BINV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINV or GMOI?

GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 2.08% for BINV.

What is the main difference between BINV and GMOI?

They also come from different issuers: Brandes and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BINV and 0.60% for GMOI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.