PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINV vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINV vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International ETF (BINV) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BINV achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.


BINV

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.89%
6M
4.98%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITI

1D
2.65%
1M
1.46%
6M
34.68%
YTD
28.75%
1Y
68.34%
3Y*
-30.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINV vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BINV
Brandes International ETF
8.57%37.84%7.71%12.86%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
28.75%-1.76%-62.60%-35.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BINV and BITI is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINV vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINV
BINV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BINV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
BINV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINV vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International ETF (BINV) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BINVBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.72

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.29

6.78

-0.49

BINV vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINV Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINV and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BINV vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINV drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINV and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINVBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-92.16%

+77.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-25.28%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-85.94%

+83.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-68.34%

+65.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

10.11%

-6.56%

Volatility

BINV vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International ETF (BINV) is 3.46%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that BINV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINVBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

11.38%

-7.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

34.25%

-22.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

44.14%

-30.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.68%

52.28%

-37.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.68%

52.28%

-37.60%

BINV vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINV has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINV vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

BINV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BINV
Brandes International ETF
2.18%2.23%2.40%0.28%0.00%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.10%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINV and BITI have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to BINV (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINV dropped -14.91% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs 22.29% for BINV. On fees, BINV is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BINV has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs 22.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BINV is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 2.18% for BINV.

BINV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Brandes and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BINV and 1.03% for BITI.

BINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINV and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer