BINC vs. ABI
BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) and ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, BINC returned 4.92% vs 5.25% for ABI. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BINC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ABI.
Performance
BINC vs. ABI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BINC achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 3.08% return.
BINC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 4.92%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINC vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.13% | 3.96% |
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 3.08% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BINC and ABI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BINC vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank
BINC
ABI
BINC vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BINC | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.01 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 5.55 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 16.81 | -9.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BINC vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and ABI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BINC | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -0.95% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -0.95% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.05% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.36% | -0.17% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.31% | +0.38% |
Volatility
BINC vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) has a higher volatility of 0.71% compared to VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) at 0.35%. This indicates that BINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BINC | ABI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 0.35% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.94% | 0.81% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32% | 1.28% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 1.26% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 1.26% | +1.72% |
BINC vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BINC vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison
BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, less than ABI's 6.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF | 6.21% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.86% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BINC and ABI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BINC has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to ABI (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINC dropped -2.69% vs ABI's -0.95%.
On 1-year performance, ABI leads with 5.25% vs 4.92% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ABI has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABI has performed better with a 5.25% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ABI.
ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 5.86% for BINC.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.65% for ABI.
ABI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BINC and ABI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer