BILZ vs. NRES

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and NRES (Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO, while NRES is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Xtrackers. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BILZ returned 3.81% vs 34.49% for NRES. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BILZ charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for NRES.

Performance

BILZ vs. NRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILZ achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than NRES's 13.66% return.

BILZ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 1.80%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 1Y: 3.81%
• 3Y*: 4.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.65%

NRES

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 5.89%
• 6M: 2.78%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 1Y: 34.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	$16.21M	$18.47M	$22.55M
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	$30.73K	$18.46K	$20.92K

BILZ vs. NRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.08%	4.21%	4.42%
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	13.66%	27.08%	-3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BILZ and NRES is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024	-0.03

Return for Risk

BILZ vs. NRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BILZ

BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

NRES

NRES Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NRES Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NRES Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NRES Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NRES Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BILZ vs. NRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) and Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BILZ	NRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	18.44	1.97	+16.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	116.58	2.58	+113.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	44.52	1.34	+43.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	196.19	2.59	+193.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1,864.61	7.70	+1,856.91

BILZ vs. NRES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILZ Sharpe Ratio is 18.44, which is higher than the NRES Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILZ and NRES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BILZ vs. NRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILZ drawdown since its inception was -0.52%, smaller than the maximum NRES drawdown of -22.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILZ and NRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILZ	NRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-22.22%	+21.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-13.25%	+13.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.61%	+6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-5.48%	+5.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	4.45%	-4.45%

Volatility

BILZ vs. NRES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ) is 0.06%, while Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF (NRES) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that BILZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BILZ	NRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.06%	4.16%	-4.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.15%	13.75%	-13.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21%	17.50%	-17.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.51%	18.03%	-17.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.51%	18.03%	-17.52%

BILZ vs. NRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILZ has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than NRES's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BILZ vs. NRES - Dividend Comparison

BILZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than NRES's 2.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	3.64%	4.19%	4.95%	2.23%
NRES Xtrackers RREEF Global Natural Resources ETF	2.50%	2.65%	3.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILZ and NRES in my portfolio?

BILZ and NRES have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BILZ or NRES?

NRES has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BILZ (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILZ dropped -0.52% vs NRES's -22.22%.

Which ETF is better, BILZ or NRES?

On 1-year performance, NRES leads with 34.49% vs 3.81% for BILZ. On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, BILZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BILZ or NRES?

Over the 1-year period, NRES has performed better with a 34.49% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BILZ or NRES?

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for NRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BILZ or NRES?

BILZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 2.50% for NRES.

What is the main difference between BILZ and NRES?

BILZ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NRES is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BILZ and 0.45% for NRES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BILZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.44 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.