BILT vs. FPWR
BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FPWR.
Performance
BILT vs. FPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BILT having a 13.47% return and FPWR slightly lower at 13.27%.
BILT
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPWR
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BILT vs. FPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 13.47% | 4.16% |
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 13.27% | 1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILT and FPWR is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILT vs. FPWR — Risk / Return Rank
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPWR
BILT vs. FPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILT | FPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILT vs. FPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum FPWR drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and FPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILT | FPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -32.28% | +26.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -2.69% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -4.98% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
BILT vs. FPWR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILT | FPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 10.57% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 14.21% | -3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.28% | 17.36% | -7.08% |
BILT vs. FPWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FPWR's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILT vs. FPWR - Dividend Comparison
BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than FPWR's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.74% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 1.72% | 1.66% | 1.68% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILT and FPWR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for FPWR.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 1.81% for FPWR.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.96% for FPWR.
Find the right allocation for BILT and FPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer