BILT vs. FFUT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILT is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.

Performance

BILT vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than FFUT's 8.83% return.

BILT

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -0.78%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 13.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFUT

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.28%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILT vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	13.47%	4.16%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	8.83%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BILT and FFUT is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

BILT vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFUT

FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 64
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILT vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BILT	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.55	—

Drawdowns

BILT vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -4.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILT	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-4.33%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-4.33%	+2.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-0.96%	-0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BILT	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.93%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.28%	11.22%	-0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.28%	11.02%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.28%	11.02%	-0.74%

BILT vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

BILT vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than FFUT's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF	5.74%	0.99%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.92%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BILT and FFUT in my portfolio?

BILT and FFUT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BILT or FFUT?

On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BILT or FFUT?

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BILT or FFUT?

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 1.92% for FFUT.

What is the main difference between BILT and FFUT?

BILT is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.80% for FFUT.