BILT vs. BSCQ
BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILT is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. BILT is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
BILT vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 15.92% return, which is significantly higher than BSCQ's 1.88% return.
BILT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 15.55%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
BILT vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 15.92% | 4.16% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.88% | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILT and BSCQ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILT vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCQ
BILT vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILT | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 41.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 182.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILT vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILT | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -16.50% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.05% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -2.82% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
BILT vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILT | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 0.60% | +9.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 3.28% | +7.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.34% | 4.74% | +5.60% |
BILT vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILT vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than BSCQ's 4.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.62% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.10% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILT and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.62%, compared with 4.10% for BSCQ.
BILT is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for BILT and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer