PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILDX vs. NPCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BILDX vs. NPCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BILDX vs. NPCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
-0.28%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.49%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
3.03%9.87%17.23%7.78%-37.50%-4.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than NPCT's 3.03% return.


BILDX

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
0.54%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
1.73%
10Y*

NPCT

1D
3.35%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-1.87%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BILDX vs. NPCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than NPCT's 5.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BILDX vs. NPCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NPCT
NPCT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NPCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPCT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NPCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILDX vs. NPCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILDXNPCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

0.64

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

0.99

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

1.02

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.29

2.56

+4.73

BILDX vs. NPCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the NPCT Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILDX and NPCT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILDXNPCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.64

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

-0.25

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between BILDX and NPCT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BILDX vs. NPCT - Dividend Comparison

BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than NPCT's 12.55% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.44%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%
NPCT
Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund
12.55%13.15%12.20%10.28%11.93%3.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BILDX vs. NPCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum NPCT drawdown of -46.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and NPCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDXNPCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-46.77%

+31.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-7.30%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-16.35%

+14.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-25.61%

+22.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

2.90%

-2.18%

Volatility

BILDX vs. NPCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 1.35%, while Nuveen Core Plus Impact Fund (NPCT) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BILDXNPCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

4.90%

-3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.07%

6.53%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.46%

11.93%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

13.15%

-8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.11%

13.15%

-9.04%