BILDX vs. DBLSX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX).
BILDX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 1, 2016. DBLSX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Sep 30, 2011.
Performance
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | -0.28% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 0.36% | 5.74% | 5.32% | 6.76% | -2.69% | 0.70% | 2.02% | 4.73% | 1.40% | 2.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than DBLSX's 0.36% return.
BILDX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DBLSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLSX's 0.41% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BILDX vs. DBLSX — Risk / Return Rank
BILDX
DBLSX
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILDX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 3.69 | -2.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 5.93 | -3.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.04 | -0.78 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 6.46 | -4.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 28.25 | -20.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILDX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 3.69 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 2.27 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.05 | +0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between BILDX and DBLSX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Dividend Comparison
BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than DBLSX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.44% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBLSX DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund | 4.19% | 4.64% | 5.09% | 4.49% | 2.50% | 1.72% | 2.37% | 3.21% | 2.92% | 2.42% | 2.52% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum DBLSX drawdown of -57.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and DBLSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILDX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -57.22% | +41.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -0.72% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | -4.71% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -45.38% | +43.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -31.35% | +28.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.17% | +0.55% |
Volatility
BILDX vs. DBLSX - Volatility Comparison
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Bond Fund (DBLSX) at 0.47%. This indicates that BILDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BILDX | DBLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 0.47% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 0.80% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 1.24% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 1.38% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 63.98% | -59.87% |