PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILD vs. XLEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILD vs. XLEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILD achieves a 7.62% return, which is significantly lower than XLEI's 14.83% return.


BILD

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
7.62%
6M
7.81%
1Y
16.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLEI

1D
0.44%
1M
-4.42%
YTD
14.83%
6M
15.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILD vs. XLEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BILD and XLEI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.15

BILD vs. XLEI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BILD
XLEI

Utilities

52.8%

-

Industrials

22.1%

-

Energy

18.2%
100.0%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

BILD
52.8%
XLEI

-

Industrials

BILD
22.1%
XLEI

-

Energy

BILD
18.2%
XLEI
100.0%

Real Estate

BILD
5.4%
XLEI

-

Communication Services

BILD
1.5%
XLEI

-

Basic Materials

BILD

-

XLEI

-

Consumer Cyclical

BILD

-

XLEI

-

Consumer Defensive

BILD

-

XLEI

-

Financial Services

BILD

-

XLEI
100.3%

Healthcare

BILD

-

XLEI

-

Technology

BILD

-

XLEI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILD vs. XLEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILD
BILD Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

XLEI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILD vs. XLEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILDXLEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

BILD vs. XLEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILD vs. XLEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILD drawdown since its inception was -14.78%, which is greater than XLEI's maximum drawdown of -7.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILD and XLEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDXLEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-7.98%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-5.56%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-1.67%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

Volatility

BILD vs. XLEI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILDXLEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.86%

13.89%

-3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

13.89%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.15%

13.89%

-0.74%

BILD vs. XLEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILD vs. XLEI - Dividend Comparison

BILD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, less than XLEI's 17.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
5.81%3.05%5.53%0.52%
XLEI
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
17.40%10.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILD and XLEI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 17.40%, compared with 5.81% for BILD.

They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BILD and 0.35% for XLEI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILD and XLEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer