PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. IUVF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BIL is traded in USD, while IUVF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IUVF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than IUVF.L's 40.87% return.


BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
2.19%

IUVF.L

1D
0.54%
1M
7.62%
YTD
40.87%
6M
41.96%
1Y
77.88%
3Y*
30.51%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.56%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
IUVF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS
40.87%33.27%6.43%13.99%-14.83%30.10%-1.83%27.01%-12.42%21.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and IUVF.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2016

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. IUVF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IUVF.L
IUVF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUVF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILIUVF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+14.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+167.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.91

1.79

+86.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

355.36

10.03

+345.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,817.81

39.11

+2,778.70

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.59, which is higher than the IUVF.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and IUVF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum IUVF.L drawdown of -39.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and IUVF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILIUVF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-39.29%

+38.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-7.73%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-18.56%

+18.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-27.00%

+26.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.70%

+4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-7.38%

+7.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

1.98%

-1.98%

Volatility

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.06%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS (IUVF.L) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUVF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILIUVF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

7.37%

-7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

13.29%

-13.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

16.48%

-16.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

17.52%

-17.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

18.97%

-18.71%

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IUVF.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIL vs. IUVF.L - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while IUVF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
IUVF.L
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor UCITS
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and IUVF.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BIL is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BIL is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUVF.L.

BIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while IUVF.L is Large Cap Value Equities. BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while IUVF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BIL and 0.20% for IUVF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and IUVF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer