PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. IBTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%

IBTE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILIBTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

355.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,817.77

BIL vs. IBTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILIBTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.78

Drawdowns

BIL vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and IBTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILIBTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

0.00%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

BIL vs. IBTE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILIBTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

0.00%

+0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

0.00%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

0.00%

+0.26%

BIL vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIL has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BIL vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
IBTE
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IBTE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for BIL and 0.07% for IBTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and IBTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer