PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. BSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. BSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than BSX's -50.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BIL has underperformed BSX with an annualized return of 2.20%, while BSX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.42% annualized return.


BIL

1D
0.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
2.20%

BSX

1D
-0.55%
1M
-10.95%
YTD
-50.80%
6M
-49.33%
1Y
-52.97%
3Y*
-2.85%
5Y*
1.80%
10Y*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. BSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.60%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
-50.80%6.75%54.51%24.94%8.92%18.16%-20.50%27.96%42.56%14.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and BSX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2007

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. BSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BSX
BSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. BSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+21.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+177.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

88.41

0.67

+87.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

357.44

-0.93

+358.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,834.34

-2.00

+2,836.33

BIL vs. BSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.63, which is higher than the BSX Sharpe Ratio of -1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and BSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIL vs. BSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum BSX drawdown of -89.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and BSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-89.15%

+88.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-56.62%

+56.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-56.62%

+56.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-56.62%

+56.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

-56.62%

+56.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-56.62%

+56.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-38.76%

+38.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

26.23%

-26.23%

Volatility

BIL vs. BSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.06%, while Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) has a volatility of 15.84%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

15.84%

-15.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

32.83%

-32.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

34.77%

-34.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

25.69%

-25.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

27.29%

-27.03%

Dividends

BIL vs. BSX - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while BSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and BSX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSX has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs BSX's -89.15%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.63 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and BSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer