PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIL vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIL vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIL achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BIL has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 2.19%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


BIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.78%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
3.42%
10Y*
2.19%

BRK-B

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.32%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-2.06%
1Y
-1.32%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIL vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.54%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-3.11%10.89%27.09%15.46%3.31%28.95%2.37%10.93%3.01%21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BIL and BRK-B is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIL vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIL vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+19.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+174.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

88.16

1.00

+87.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

356.40

-0.14

+356.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2,826.06

-0.30

+2,826.35

BIL vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIL Sharpe Ratio is 19.64, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIL and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64

-0.09

+19.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

13.23

0.65

+12.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.57

0.68

+7.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.78

0.48

+2.30

Drawdowns

BIL vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIL drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIL and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-53.86%

+53.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

-9.42%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.01%

-14.95%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.09%

-26.58%

+26.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.21%

-29.57%

+29.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.78%

+9.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.26%

-11.07%

+10.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

4.49%

-4.49%

Volatility

BIL vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) is 0.06%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that BIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

3.98%

-3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

10.87%

-10.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20%

14.38%

-14.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.26%

17.13%

-16.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.26%

19.44%

-19.18%

Dividends

BIL vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIL and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRK-B has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIL dropped -0.78% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.64 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIL and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer