PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BIGY.TO

1D
1.30%
1M
-8.27%
YTD
-8.43%
6M
-9.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZEQL.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
6.25%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BIGY.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGY.TO and ZEQL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIGY.TOZEQL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.81%

-6.12%

-21.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.86%

0.00%

-17.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-1.78%

-9.73%

Volatility

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIGY.TOZEQL.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.01%

13.44%

+15.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

13.44%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.01%

13.44%

+15.57%

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQL.TO's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIGY.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison

BIGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.66%, more than ZEQL.TO's 0.36% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BIGY.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEQL.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Evolve and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BIGY.TO and 0.05% for ZEQL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIGY.TO and ZEQL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer