ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO
ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) and XUH.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds — ZEQL.TO tracks the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index while XUH.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEQL.TO charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XUH.TO.
Performance
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
ZEQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUH.TO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | -0.18% |
XUH.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEQL.TO and XUH.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEQL.TO
XUH.TO
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XUH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEQL.TO | XUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.60 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum XUH.TO drawdown of -38.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQL.TO and XUH.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEQL.TO | XUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -38.37% | +32.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -0.70% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -5.02% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZEQL.TO | XUH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 13.55% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 17.12% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.46% | 18.69% | -5.23% |
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEQL.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XUH.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZEQL.TO vs. XUH.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than XUH.TO's 0.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUH.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.89% | 0.91% | 1.10% | 1.15% | 1.40% | 0.98% | 1.25% | 1.67% | 1.81% | 1.25% | 1.63% | 1.62% |