BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO
BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) and ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) are both exchange-traded funds - BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve, while ZDY.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZDY.TO.
Performance
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIGY.TO achieves a -8.43% return, which is significantly lower than ZDY.TO's 18.49% return.
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -8.27%
- YTD
- -8.43%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDY.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 18.49%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -8.43% | -1.05% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 18.49% | -5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIGY.TO and ZDY.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BIGY.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZDY.TO
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO) and BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIGY.TO | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, smaller than the maximum ZDY.TO drawdown of -32.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGY.TO and ZDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIGY.TO | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -32.99% | +5.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.86% | 0.00% | -17.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -3.42% | -8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.49% | — |
Volatility
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIGY.TO | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.01% | 12.95% | +16.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 12.44% | +16.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 15.30% | +13.71% |
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDY.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIGY.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.66%, more than ZDY.TO's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 29.66% | 9.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 1.49% | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 2.33% | 3.65% | 3.02% | 2.80% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIGY.TO and ZDY.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDY.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDY.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
BIGY.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZDY.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BIGY.TO and 0.30% for ZDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for BIGY.TO and ZDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer