PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIDD vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIDD vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDD achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.


BIDD

1D
-3.48%
1M
0.14%
YTD
9.17%
6M
9.50%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDD vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BIDD
iShares International Dividend Active ETF
9.17%20.17%-1.39%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDD and IBIC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIDD vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDD
BIDD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDD vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIDDIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

2.22

-1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

16.56

-14.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

58.67

-52.68

BIDD vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDD and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIDD vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDD drawdown since its inception was -15.08%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDD and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIDDIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-0.90%

-14.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-0.27%

-12.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-0.08%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-0.10%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

0.08%

+3.25%

Volatility

BIDD vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that BIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIDDIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

0.17%

+7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

0.67%

+13.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

0.89%

+15.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

1.56%

+15.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

1.56%

+15.85%

BIDD vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIDD vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

BIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BIDD
iShares International Dividend Active ETF
7.81%2.74%0.13%0.00%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIDD and IBIC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIDD has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDD dropped -15.08% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, BIDD leads with 19.91% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BIDD has performed better with a 19.91% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BIDD.

BIDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.81%, compared with 3.58% for IBIC.

BIDD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BIDD and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIDD and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer