BIDD vs. CIL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BIDD (iShares International Dividend Active ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BIDD is actively managed, while CIL is passively managed. Over the past year, BIDD returned 23.52% vs 16.21% for CIL. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BIDD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

BIDD vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIDD achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

BIDD

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.14%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 23.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.28%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	$837.27K	$755.63K	$976.21K
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BIDD vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	10.61%	20.17%	-1.39%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	-1.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDD and CIL is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	0.65

The correlation between BIDD and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIDD vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIDD	CIL
Financial Services	26.1%	24.8%
Technology	24.8%	6.4%
Industrials	16.8%	18.4%
Communication Services	7.2%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	8.2%
Healthcare	6.0%	7.7%
Basic Materials	5.9%	6.6%
Energy	4.6%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	8.8%
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Utilities	-	6.6%

Return for Risk

BIDD vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BIDD

BIDD Risk / Return Rank: 56
BIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
BIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 93
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BIDD vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIDD	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	2.51	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	3.80	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.67	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	3.69	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.82	18.41	-11.59

BIDD vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDD and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIDD vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDD drawdown since its inception was -15.08%, smaller than the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDD and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIDD	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.08%	-36.27%	+21.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-4.60%	-7.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-0.58%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-6.47%	+4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	1.03%	+2.37%

Volatility

BIDD vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that BIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIDD	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	0.00%	+5.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.02%	2.31%	+12.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.96%	6.80%	+10.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.42%	16.39%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.42%	16.74%	+0.68%

BIDD vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIDD vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

BIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	7.71%	2.74%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.05%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIDD and CIL in my portfolio?

BIDD and CIL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIDD or CIL?

BIDD has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDD dropped -15.08% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, BIDD or CIL?

On 1-year performance, BIDD leads with 23.52% vs 16.21% for CIL. On fees, CIL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIDD or CIL?

Over the 1-year period, BIDD has performed better with a 23.52% return vs 16.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIDD or CIL?

CIL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BIDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIDD or CIL?

BIDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

What is the main difference between BIDD and CIL?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BIDD and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.