BIDAX vs. FAMRX
BIDAX (iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund) and FAMRX (Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund) are both mutual funds - BIDAX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BlackRock, while FAMRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, BIDAX returned 0.69%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for FAMRX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIDAX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FAMRX.
Performance
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIDAX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 14.17% return.
BIDAX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
FAMRX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIDAX iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund | 1.41% | 4.52% | 1.44% | 5.74% | -9.41% | 1.38% | 4.70% | 7.56% | 1.44% |
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 14.17% | 20.87% | 12.60% | 18.98% | -18.55% | 17.10% | 19.37% | 26.26% | -6.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIDAX and FAMRX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2018 | 0.08 |
The correlation between BIDAX and FAMRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIDAX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank
BIDAX
FAMRX
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIDAX | FAMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.44 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.31 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 14.35 | -7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIDAX drawdown since its inception was -14.39%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDAX and FAMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIDAX | FAMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -58.65% | +44.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -9.33% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.07% | -15.35% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.39% | -26.00% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.06% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -12.30% | +8.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 2.15% | -1.26% |
Volatility
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund (BIDAX) is 0.75%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that BIDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIDAX | FAMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | 5.36% | -4.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 10.97% | -8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66% | 13.13% | -10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 14.78% | -10.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 15.33% | -10.91% |
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIDAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIDAX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison
BIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than FAMRX's 4.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIDAX iShares Municipal Bond Index Fund | 3.11% | 4.09% | 3.25% | 2.16% | 1.92% | 2.36% | 2.35% | 3.64% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAMRX Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund | 4.87% | 5.56% | 3.44% | 1.33% | 5.07% | 3.15% | 1.99% | 5.52% | 5.62% | 2.31% | 0.28% | 4.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIDAX and FAMRX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAMRX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to BIDAX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDAX dropped -14.39% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.
BIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIDAX and FAMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer