PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BICSX vs. CCRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BICSX achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly lower than CCRSX's 27.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BICSX has outperformed CCRSX with an annualized return of 9.47%, while CCRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.04% annualized return.


BICSX

1D
0.81%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
20.87%
6M
22.97%
1Y
40.20%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
9.47%

CCRSX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
27.42%
6M
26.84%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
20.87%28.70%4.38%-4.32%11.90%22.44%6.80%11.60%-14.50%8.28%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
27.42%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BICSX and CCRSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.80

The correlation between BICSX and CCRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BICSX vs. CCRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BICSX
BICSX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
BICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BICSXCCRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

5.27

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.58

14.18

+9.40

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BICSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the CCRSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BICSX and CCRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BICSXCCRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.43

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.05

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.04

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

-0.00

+0.28

Drawdowns

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BICSX drawdown since its inception was -51.59%, smaller than the maximum CCRSX drawdown of -93.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BICSX and CCRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BICSXCCRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.59%

-93.56%

+41.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-7.53%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-11.56%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-83.30%

+60.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-83.30%

+47.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-39.88%

+37.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-51.08%

+30.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

2.79%

-1.07%

Volatility

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) is 4.41%, while Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that BICSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BICSXCCRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

5.32%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

14.26%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

16.45%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

225.85%

-210.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

159.90%

-144.86%

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BICSX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than CCRSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

BICSX vs. CCRSX - Dividend Comparison

BICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than CCRSX's 10.88% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
2.56%3.09%3.60%9.39%9.05%2.68%0.80%2.03%2.12%0.65%0.94%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.88%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BICSX and CCRSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCRSX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to BICSX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BICSX dropped -51.59% vs CCRSX's -93.56%.

BICSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BICSX and CCRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer