BICPX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BICPX (BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, BICPX returned 4.19%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for FFANX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BICPX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

BICPX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund (BICPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BICPX achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BICPX has underperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 4.19%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.

BICPX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 4.04%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 11.29%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: 4.19%

FFANX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 7.59%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 17.09%
• 3Y*: 10.99%
• 5Y*: 5.51%
• 10Y*: 6.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BICPX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BICPX BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund	4.04%	10.57%	1.29%	9.05%	-14.67%	0.23%	15.50%	12.57%	-2.21%	7.94%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	7.59%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BICPX and FFANX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007	0.89

The correlation between BICPX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BICPX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BICPX

BICPX Risk / Return Rank: 62
BICPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BICPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
BICPX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BICPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BICPX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BICPX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund (BICPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BICPX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.40	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.44	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.47	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.27	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.53	13.93	-3.41

BICPX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BICPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BICPX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BICPX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BICPX drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FFANX drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BICPX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BICPX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.00%	-31.69%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.43%	-5.20%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.69%	-7.55%	-1.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.94%	-18.52%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.94%	-18.52%	-0.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-3.79%	+0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.22%	-0.15%

Volatility

BICPX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund (BICPX) is 2.07%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that BICPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BICPX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.07%	3.02%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.46%	6.03%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.23%	7.07%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.32%	7.94%	-0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.42%	7.74%	-1.32%

BICPX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BICPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

BICPX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

BICPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BICPX BlackRock 20/80 Target Allocation Fund	4.24%	4.41%	0.00%	3.50%	3.54%	4.89%	4.25%	2.46%	5.15%	2.71%	1.85%	6.53%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.65%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BICPX and FFANX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, BICPX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BICPX or FFANX?

FFANX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to BICPX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BICPX dropped -31.00% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.