PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIBDX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBDX achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 7.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBDX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.


BIBDX

1D
0.54%
1M
5.82%
YTD
11.03%
6M
11.33%
1Y
25.01%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.38%

GLIFX

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.56%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBDX
BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio
11.03%19.32%9.72%16.59%-13.72%17.70%6.91%22.80%-10.46%19.39%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.33%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBDX and GLIFX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between BIBDX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIBDX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBDX
BIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
BIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIBDXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

1.74

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

5.88

+4.52

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBDX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIBDXGLIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.46

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

1.03

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.77

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.84

-0.33

Drawdowns

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBDX drawdown since its inception was -41.81%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBDX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIBDXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.81%

-29.65%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-9.00%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-10.02%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.44%

-17.15%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.15%

-29.65%

-3.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.79%

+5.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.72%

-3.36%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.66%

-0.24%

Volatility

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) is 3.96%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that BIBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIBDXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

4.53%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

9.30%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

10.72%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

10.99%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

13.33%

+1.86%

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBDX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIBDX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

BIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.20%, more than GLIFX's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBDX
BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio
18.20%20.14%8.09%2.00%6.51%18.01%5.94%7.97%7.05%6.47%2.47%4.34%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
6.29%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIBDX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to BIBDX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBDX dropped -41.81% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

BIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIBDX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer