BIB vs. SPUU
BIB (ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - BIB tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (200%) while SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIB returned 9.71%/yr vs 24.81%/yr for SPUU. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
BIB vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIB achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, BIB has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of 9.71%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.81% annualized return.
BIB
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 8.62%
- 1Y
- 100.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
SPUU
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 43.00%
- 3Y*
- 34.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.44%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
BIB vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | 12.50% | 59.21% | -9.84% | -1.06% | -28.85% | -6.02% | 39.79% | 46.71% | -24.93% | 40.49% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 13.33% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 61.27% | 21.85% | 66.84% | -14.59% | 44.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIB and SPUU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BIB and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BIB vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BIB
SPUU
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
BIB
SPUU
Financial Services
BIB
SPUU
Basic Materials
BIB
-
SPUU
Communication Services
BIB
-
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
BIB
-
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
BIB
-
SPUU
Energy
BIB
-
SPUU
Industrials
BIB
-
SPUU
Real Estate
BIB
-
SPUU
Technology
BIB
-
SPUU
Utilities
BIB
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIB vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
BIB
SPUU
BIB vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.99 | 2.38 | +3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.30 | 10.11 | +8.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIB vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIB drawdown since its inception was -67.24%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIB and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.24% | -59.35% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.92% | -18.19% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.30% | -35.18% | -10.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.86% | -46.59% | -19.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.20% | -59.35% | -6.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.29% | -6.62% | -10.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -9.48% | -23.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 4.27% | +1.26% |
Volatility
BIB vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) has a higher volatility of 13.56% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 9.70%. This indicates that BIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.56% | 9.70% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.65% | 19.93% | +11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.43% | 25.22% | +15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.60% | 33.67% | +9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.39% | 35.81% | +10.58% |
BIB vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIB vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
BIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than SPUU's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIB ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology | 0.55% | 0.77% | 1.69% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.42% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIB and SPUU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIB has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to SPUU (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIB dropped -67.24% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.81% vs 9.71% for BIB. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BIB.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.55% for BIB.
BIB tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BIB and 0.60% for SPUU.
BIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIB and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer