BIAWX vs. GXXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX).
BIAWX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012. GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund | -12.47% | 3.18% | 20.20% | 38.88% | -31.02% | 29.83% | 38.88% | 35.93% | 4.36% | 27.89% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -7.53% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIAWX achieves a -12.47% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's -7.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIAWX having a 13.60% annualized return and GXXIX not far behind at 13.33%.
BIAWX
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -12.47%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
GXXIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIAWX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIAWX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
BIAWX
GXXIX
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIAWX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.19 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.19 | 0.40 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.05 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 0.31 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 1.15 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIAWX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.19 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.34 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.56 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.60 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIAWX and GXXIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
BIAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.02%, more than GXXIX's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund | 28.02% | 24.52% | 5.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.85% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 3.75% | 1.71% | 0.72% | 4.76% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.48% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIAWX drawdown since its inception was -36.94%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAWX and GXXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIAWX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.94% | -33.65% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -11.78% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.94% | -33.65% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.94% | -33.65% | -3.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.27% | -10.87% | -6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.72% | -6.20% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.98% | 3.14% | +3.84% |
Volatility
BIAWX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund (BIAWX) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 5.20%. This indicates that BIAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIAWX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 5.20% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 9.27% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 16.73% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 27.78% | -5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 23.72% | -2.29% |