BIASX vs. ETMGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BIASX (Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund) and ETMGX (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BIASX returned 9.19%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for ETMGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.11% expense ratio.

Performance

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIASX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than ETMGX's 1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BIASX has outperformed ETMGX with an annualized return of 9.19%, while ETMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.

BIASX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.37%
• YTD: 10.50%
• 6M: 9.88%
• 1Y: 15.66%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

ETMGX

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -1.63%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 0.06%
• 1Y: -1.73%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIASX Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund	10.50%	2.29%	4.29%	12.43%	-20.27%	7.31%	31.78%	36.26%	-4.47%	16.91%
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund	1.62%	-6.63%	11.43%	11.06%	-16.53%	20.91%	12.33%	27.32%	-5.86%	15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BIASX and ETMGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.88

The correlation between BIASX and ETMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIASX vs. ETMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIASX

BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 16
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

ETMGX

ETMGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
ETMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ETMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ETMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ETMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIASX	ETMGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	-0.13	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	-0.08	+1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.99	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	-0.16	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.34	-0.36	+5.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIASX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the ETMGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIASX and ETMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIASX	ETMGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	-0.13	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	0.04	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.38	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.47	-0.17

Drawdowns

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIASX drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than ETMGX's maximum drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIASX and ETMGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIASX	ETMGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.26%	-37.02%	-36.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	-13.14%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.98%	-22.28%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.61%	-25.14%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.04%	-37.02%	-1.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-12.90%	+12.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.48%	-6.58%	-16.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	5.85%	-2.78%

Volatility

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) have volatilities of 4.56% and 4.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIASX	ETMGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.56%	4.45%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.36%	11.19%	+1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.08%	16.08%	+1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	18.75%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.94%	19.92%	+0.02%

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BIASX and ETMGX have an expense ratio of 1.11%.

Dividends

BIASX vs. ETMGX - Dividend Comparison

BIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.76%, more than ETMGX's 6.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIASX Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund	17.76%	19.62%	5.78%	0.00%	8.22%	13.22%	0.78%	4.00%	5.17%	1.69%	3.50%	16.77%
ETMGX Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund	6.93%	7.04%	2.85%	1.36%	2.80%	8.28%	0.09%	6.50%	7.75%	11.87%	6.00%	5.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIASX and ETMGX in my portfolio?

BIASX and ETMGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIASX or ETMGX?

BIASX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to ETMGX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIASX dropped -73.26% vs ETMGX's -37.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.