PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIASX vs. BIAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIASX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than BIAHX's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, BIASX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.67% annualized return.


BIASX

1D
0.14%
1M
4.85%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.52%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
9.21%

BIAHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.95%
YTD
0.84%
6M
3.22%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
10.70%2.29%4.29%12.43%-20.27%7.31%31.78%36.26%-4.47%16.91%
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
0.84%47.26%10.85%19.36%-11.95%14.54%11.34%29.43%-16.60%32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BIASX and BIAHX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.62

The correlation between BIASX and BIAHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIASX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIASX
BIASX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BIASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIASX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BIASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIASX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIASXBIAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.84

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

2.61

+3.39

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIASX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIASXBIAHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

0.80

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.75

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.58

-0.28

Drawdowns

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIASX drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIASX and BIAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIASXBIAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.26%

-34.90%

-38.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

-13.18%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.98%

-13.18%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

-30.95%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-34.90%

-3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-6.93%

+6.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.48%

-6.03%

-17.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.23%

-1.16%

Volatility

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund (BIASX) is 4.55%, while Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that BIASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIASXBIAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.90%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

11.49%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.07%

13.93%

+3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

16.36%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

17.29%

+2.65%

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIASX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIASX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

BIASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.72%, more than BIAHX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.54%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%0.00%
BIASX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund
17.72%19.62%5.78%0.00%8.22%13.22%0.78%4.00%5.17%1.69%3.50%16.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIASX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIAHX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to BIASX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIASX dropped -73.26% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

BIASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIASX and BIAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer