BIAMX vs. FSMUX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BIAMX (Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, BIAMX returned 3.89%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for FSMUX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BIAMX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.

Performance

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAMX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.

BIAMX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 2.12%
• 1Y: 7.04%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: 0.96%
• 10Y*: 1.58%

FSMUX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BIAMX Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund	1.60%	4.74%	1.67%	5.47%	-8.32%	0.08%
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	1.47%	3.14%	2.99%	6.78%	-11.25%	0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAMX and FSMUX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021	0.83

The correlation between BIAMX and FSMUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BIAMX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAMX

BIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 71
BIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
BIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FSMUX

FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIAMX	FSMUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	2.69	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.64	4.63	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.71	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	3.15	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.87	11.49	-2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAMX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIAMX	FSMUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	2.69	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.11	+0.78

Drawdowns

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAMX drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAMX and FSMUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAMX	FSMUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-16.27%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-2.68%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.55%	-5.95%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	0.00%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-5.46%	+3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	1.83%	-1.05%

Volatility

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) is 0.92%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that BIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAMX	FSMUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	1.21%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.96%	2.10%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50%	3.16%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	4.64%	-1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.29%	4.64%	-1.35%

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAMX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAMX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

BIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAMX Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund	3.59%	3.55%	3.28%	2.73%	1.69%	1.69%	2.48%	2.71%	2.56%	1.65%	0.37%	0.48%
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	2.99%	3.26%	3.74%	3.18%	2.14%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAMX and FSMUX in my portfolio?

BIAMX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIAMX or FSMUX?

FSMUX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to BIAMX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAMX dropped -12.44% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.