BIAMX vs. BIAHX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BIAMX (Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund) and BIAHX (Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - BIAMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds, while BIAHX is a Europe Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 10 years, BIAMX returned 1.48%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for BIAHX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIAMX charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for BIAHX.

Performance

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, BIAMX has underperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 1.48%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.

BIAMX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

BIAHX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -0.38%
• 1Y: 10.15%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: 12.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIAMX Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund	1.50%	4.74%	1.67%	5.47%	-8.32%	1.04%	2.35%	6.70%	1.43%	3.32%
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	0.00%	47.26%	10.85%	19.36%	-11.95%	14.54%	11.34%	29.43%	-16.60%	32.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAMX and BIAHX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013	0.01

Over the past year, BIAMX and BIAHX have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

BIAMX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAMX

BIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 73
BIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
BIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BIAHX

BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIAMX	BIAHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	0.78	+1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	1.21	+3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.15	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	0.83	+1.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.51	2.42	+6.09

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the BIAHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAMX and BIAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAMX drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, smaller than the maximum BIAHX drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAMX and BIAHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAMX	BIAHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-34.90%	+22.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-13.18%	+10.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.55%	-13.18%	+8.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.44%	-30.95%	+18.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.44%	-34.90%	+22.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-7.70%	+7.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-6.03%	+4.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	4.53%	-3.74%

Volatility

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) is 0.73%, while Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that BIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAMX	BIAHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.73%	3.94%	-3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.95%	11.83%	-9.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48%	14.04%	-11.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	16.40%	-13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.29%	17.22%	-13.93%

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAMX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAMX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison

BIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than BIAHX's 7.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund	7.60%	7.60%	5.16%	1.13%	2.66%	9.72%	6.39%	9.78%	12.12%	0.83%	1.19%	0.00%
BIAMX Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund	3.59%	3.55%	3.28%	2.73%	1.69%	1.69%	2.48%	2.71%	2.56%	1.65%	0.37%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAMX and BIAHX in my portfolio?

BIAMX and BIAHX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIAMX or BIAHX?

BIAHX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to BIAMX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAMX dropped -12.44% vs BIAHX's -34.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.