BIAMX vs. BVALX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BIAMX (Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund) and BVALX (Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - BIAMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds, while BVALX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory Funds. Over the past 5 years, BIAMX returned 0.94%/yr vs 8.38%/yr for BVALX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIAMX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BVALX.

Performance

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) and Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAMX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than BVALX's 8.89% return.

BIAMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 6.81%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

BVALX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.93%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 6M: 8.06%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: 10.85%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BIAMX Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund	1.60%	4.74%	1.67%	5.47%	-8.32%	1.04%	2.35%	6.70%	1.99%
BVALX Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund	8.89%	5.26%	11.49%	12.30%	2.07%	14.73%	11.54%	31.28%	-7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAMX and BVALX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2018	0.04

The correlation between BIAMX and BVALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BIAMX vs. BVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAMX

BIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 73
BIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
BIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BVALX

BVALX Risk / Return Rank: 27
BVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) and Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIAMX	BVALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	1.37	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	2.06	+2.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.24	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	1.83	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.51	6.18	+2.33

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the BVALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAMX and BVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAMX drawdown since its inception was -12.44%, smaller than the maximum BVALX drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAMX and BVALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIAMX	BVALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.44%	-32.88%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-10.09%	+7.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.55%	-19.90%	+15.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.44%	-19.90%	+7.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-1.43%	+1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-4.28%	+2.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	2.99%	-2.20%

Volatility

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund (BIAMX) is 0.71%, while Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund (BVALX) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that BIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIAMX	BVALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	4.20%	-3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	10.10%	-8.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47%	13.54%	-11.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.33%	15.79%	-12.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.28%	18.22%	-14.94%

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAMX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BVALX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIAMX vs. BVALX - Dividend Comparison

BIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than BVALX's 5.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIAMX Brown Advisory Maryland Bond Fund	3.59%	3.55%	3.28%	2.73%	1.69%	1.69%	2.48%	2.71%	2.56%	1.65%	0.37%	0.48%
BVALX Brown Advisory - Beutel Goodman Large-Cap Value Fund	5.94%	6.47%	8.20%	1.78%	3.62%	9.06%	3.14%	2.95%	2.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIAMX and BVALX in my portfolio?

BIAMX and BVALX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIAMX or BVALX?

BVALX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to BIAMX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAMX dropped -12.44% vs BVALX's -32.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.