PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAHX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAHX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAHX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 8.81% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAHX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.95%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.


BIAHX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
2.45%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
11.95%

VTI

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.22%
YTD
8.81%
6M
8.81%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
14.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAHX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
-0.34%47.26%10.85%19.36%-11.95%14.54%11.34%29.43%-16.60%32.37%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.81%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAHX and VTI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.68

The correlation between BIAHX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAHX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAHX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAHXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

2.77

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.16

12.60

-10.44

BIAHX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAHX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAHXVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.99

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.70

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.81

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.50

+0.07

Drawdowns

BIAHX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAHX drawdown since its inception was -34.90%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAHX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAHXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.90%

-55.45%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-8.92%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-19.30%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.95%

-25.36%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

-35.00%

+0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-2.86%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-8.02%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

1.96%

+2.38%

Volatility

BIAHX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.82%. This indicates that BIAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAHXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.82%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

9.55%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

12.42%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

17.44%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

18.32%

-1.02%

BIAHX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAHX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAHX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BIAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.63%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAHX and VTI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIAHX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to VTI (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAHX dropped -34.90% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAHX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer