BIAGX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
BIAGX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Jun 28, 1999. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund | -10.33% | 0.61% | 16.60% | 33.90% | -33.60% | 18.56% | 32.41% | 47.97% | 4.66% | -0.53% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIAGX achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -9.81% return.
BIAGX
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -15.08%
- 1Y
- -3.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIAGX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIAGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
BIAGX
SWLGX
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 0.83 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | 1.35 | -1.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.17 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 4.02 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 0.83 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.58 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.70 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIAGX and SWLGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
BIAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.47%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIAGX Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund | 96.47% | 86.50% | 91.52% | 6.80% | 7.75% | 13.04% | 4.95% | 9.82% | 12.64% | 8.09% | 9.13% | 6.59% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIAGX drawdown since its inception was -56.68%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAGX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.68% | -32.69% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.56% | -16.16% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.68% | -32.69% | -23.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.05% | -13.03% | -40.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.78% | -7.13% | -7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.62% | 4.69% | +2.93% |
Volatility
BIAGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund (BIAGX) is 6.09%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that BIAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIAGX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 6.73% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 12.40% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 22.57% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.26% | 21.52% | +25.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.32% | 22.81% | +13.51% |