BHYB vs. RISR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BHYB (Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF) and RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BHYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB-B Non-FNCL Non-Distressed US HY Constrained Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while RISR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by FolioBeyond. BHYB is passively managed, while RISR is actively managed. Over the past year, BHYB returned 7.34% vs 4.20% for RISR. At a correlation of -0.31, they often move in opposite directions. BHYB charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RISR.

Performance

BHYB vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHYB achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 2.78% return.

BHYB

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 7.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RISR

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 3.60%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHYB vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BHYB Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF	1.69%	8.90%	6.44%	8.23%
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	2.78%	4.63%	24.20%	-6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BHYB and RISR is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2023	-0.31

Return for Risk

BHYB vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHYB

BHYB Risk / Return Rank: 71
BHYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BHYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BHYB Omega Ratio Rank: 74
BHYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BHYB Martin Ratio Rank: 77

RISR

RISR Risk / Return Rank: 25
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHYB vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BHYB	RISR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	0.78	+1.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	1.13	+2.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.14	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	1.62	+1.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.88	3.81	+11.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BHYB vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHYB Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHYB and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BHYB	RISR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	0.78	+1.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.10	1.24	+0.87

Drawdowns

BHYB vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHYB drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum RISR drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHYB and RISR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BHYB	RISR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-14.31%	+10.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.27%	-2.61%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.71%	+0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-2.19%	+1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.49%	1.11%	-0.62%

Volatility

BHYB vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF (BHYB) is 1.02%, while FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that BHYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BHYB	RISR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.27%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.52%	4.09%	-1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	5.44%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.71%	11.85%	-7.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.71%	11.85%	-7.14%

BHYB vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHYB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

BHYB vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

BHYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than RISR's 5.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BHYB Xtrackers USD High Yield BB-B ex Financials ETF	6.33%	6.57%	7.04%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF	5.93%	5.95%	5.67%	7.96%	4.26%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BHYB and RISR in my portfolio?

BHYB and RISR have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BHYB or RISR?

RISR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to BHYB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHYB dropped -4.23% vs RISR's -14.31%.

Which ETF is better, BHYB or RISR?

On 1-year performance, BHYB leads with 7.34% vs 4.20% for RISR. On fees, BHYB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BHYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BHYB or RISR?

Over the 1-year period, BHYB has performed better with a 7.34% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BHYB or RISR?

BHYB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BHYB or RISR?

BHYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 5.93% for RISR.

What is the main difference between BHYB and RISR?

BHYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for BHYB and 1.13% for RISR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BHYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.