PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHP vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHP vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a 53.40% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, BHP has outperformed WMT with an annualized return of 23.18%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.77% annualized return.


BHP

1D
3.20%
1M
0.01%
YTD
53.40%
6M
55.28%
1Y
90.03%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
23.18%

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHP vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHP
BHP Group Limited
53.40%28.91%-24.64%16.50%44.34%0.91%25.37%24.50%10.55%33.87%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BHP and WMT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1987

0.18

The correlation between BHP and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BHP:

$231.09B

WMT:

$968.20B

EPS

BHP:

$8.51

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

BHP:

10.67

WMT:

42.04

PEG Ratio

BHP:

2.95

WMT:

2.75

PS Ratio

BHP:

2.15

WMT:

1.34

PB Ratio

BHP:

4.58

WMT:

10.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHP:

$107.64B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHP:

$89.04B

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

BHP:

$52.23B

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHP vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHP vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHPWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.23

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

1.83

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

5.82

+11.14

BHP vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHP Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHP and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHP vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, roughly equal to the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHPWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.22%

-77.14%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-15.75%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.21%

-21.93%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.21%

-25.74%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-25.74%

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-9.81%

+7.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-14.63%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

4.94%

+0.44%

Volatility

BHP vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 9.86%. This indicates that BHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHPWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.72%

9.86%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.69%

18.49%

+8.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.39%

23.67%

+8.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.44%

21.68%

+10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

21.73%

+10.61%

Dividends

BHP vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHP
BHP Group Limited
2.93%3.64%5.98%4.98%22.44%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.38%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

BHP vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BHP Group Limited and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B202120222023202420252026
27.95B
177.75B
(BHP) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BHP vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BHP Group Limited and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%202120222023202420252026
42.9%
25.1%
Portfolio components
BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BHP and WMT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHP has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to WMT (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHP dropped -76.22% vs WMT's -77.14%.

BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHP and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer