BHP vs. T
BHP (BHP Group Limited) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. BHP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, BHP returned 20.67%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for T. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BHP vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a 35.95% return, which is significantly higher than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BHP has outperformed T with an annualized return of 20.67%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.
BHP
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -8.40%
- 6M
- 26.54%
- YTD
- 35.95%
- 1Y
- 61.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.87%
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
BHP vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group Limited | 35.95% | 28.91% | -24.64% | 16.50% | 44.34% | 0.91% | 25.37% | 24.50% | 10.55% | 33.87% |
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHP and T is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1987 | 0.23 |
The correlation between BHP and T shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BHP:
$204.47B
T:
$152.52B
BHP:
$8.50
T:
$3.05
BHP:
9.46
T:
7.19
BHP:
2.62
T:
0.30
BHP:
1.90
T:
1.25
BHP:
$107.64B
T:
$125.65B
BHP:
$89.04B
T:
$105.41B
BHP:
$52.23B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHP vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
BHP
T
BHP vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group Limited (BHP) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BHP | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.92 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | -0.46 | +3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | -1.03 | +10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BHP vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHP | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.22% | -64.15% | -12.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.80% | -28.89% | +9.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.21% | -28.89% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.21% | -32.01% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | -42.35% | -1.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.59% | -21.57% | +7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -15.74% | -5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | 12.94% | -6.62% |
Volatility
BHP vs. T - Volatility Comparison
BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a higher volatility of 11.08% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that BHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHP | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 9.59% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.10% | 19.91% | +8.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.06% | 23.72% | +9.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 24.38% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 23.92% | +8.25% |
Dividends
BHP vs. T - Dividend Comparison
BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than T's 6.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group Limited | 3.30% | 3.64% | 5.98% | 4.98% | 22.44% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.38% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
BHP vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BHP Group Limited and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BHP and T have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BHP has higher volatility (11.08%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHP dropped -76.22% vs T's -64.15%.
BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHP and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer