PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHP vs. RVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHP vs. RVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a 53.40% return, which is significantly higher than RVT's 15.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BHP has outperformed RVT with an annualized return of 23.18%, while RVT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.17% annualized return.


BHP

1D
3.20%
1M
7.61%
YTD
53.40%
6M
55.28%
1Y
94.96%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
16.25%
10Y*
23.18%

RVT

1D
2.22%
1M
1.41%
YTD
15.52%
6M
15.09%
1Y
33.77%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHP vs. RVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHP
BHP Group Limited
53.40%28.91%-24.64%16.50%44.34%0.91%25.37%24.50%10.55%33.87%
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
15.52%11.54%17.93%18.79%-26.25%32.66%18.16%35.41%-20.70%30.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BHP and RVT is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987

0.38

The correlation between BHP and RVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BHP:

$231.09B

RVT:

$2.16B

EPS

BHP:

$8.51

RVT:

$4.02

PE Ratio

BHP:

10.67

RVT:

4.47

PS Ratio

BHP:

2.15

RVT:

12.65

PB Ratio

BHP:

4.58

RVT:

1.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHP:

$107.64B

RVT:

$170.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHP:

$89.04B

RVT:

$304.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

BHP:

$52.23B

RVT:

$439.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHP vs. RVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RVT
RVT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHP vs. RVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHPRVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.29

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

2.58

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

9.08

+7.88

BHP vs. RVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHP Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the RVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHP and RVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHP vs. RVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, which is greater than RVT's maximum drawdown of -72.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and RVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHPRVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.22%

-72.34%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-12.19%

-7.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.21%

-23.48%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.21%

-32.79%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.29%

-47.18%

+2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-2.59%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-11.29%

-9.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

3.46%

+1.92%

Volatility

BHP vs. RVT - Volatility Comparison

BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to Royce Value Trust Inc. (RVT) at 6.60%. This indicates that BHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHPRVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.72%

6.60%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.69%

13.90%

+12.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.39%

18.35%

+14.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.44%

22.50%

+9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

22.99%

+9.35%

Dividends

BHP vs. RVT - Dividend Comparison

BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than RVT's 8.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHP
BHP Group Limited
2.93%3.64%5.98%4.98%22.44%9.98%3.67%8.59%4.89%3.61%1.68%9.38%
RVT
Royce Value Trust Inc.
8.02%8.82%8.04%7.35%9.95%8.52%6.44%7.45%10.68%7.17%7.62%10.54%

Financials

BHP vs. RVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BHP Group Limited and Royce Value Trust Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
27.95B
132.59M
(BHP) Total Revenue
(RVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BHP and RVT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHP has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to RVT (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHP dropped -76.22% vs RVT's -72.34%.

BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHP and RVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer