BHP vs. GLW
BHP (BHP Group) and GLW (Corning Incorporated) are both stocks. BHP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while GLW operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BHP returned 21.94%/yr vs 27.99%/yr for GLW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BHP vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a 41.38% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 114.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BHP has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 21.94%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 27.99% annualized return.
BHP
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 41.38%
- 6M
- 46.29%
- 1Y
- 75.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
GLW
- 1D
- 5.61%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 114.91%
- 6M
- 113.18%
- 1Y
- 273.87%
- 3Y*
- 83.04%
- 5Y*
- 37.92%
- 10Y*
- 27.99%
BHP vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group | 41.38% | 28.91% | -24.64% | 16.50% | 44.34% | 0.91% | 25.37% | 24.50% | 10.55% | 33.87% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 114.91% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHP and GLW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1987 | 0.32 |
The correlation between BHP and GLW shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BHP:
$212.97B
GLW:
$161.81B
BHP:
$8.51
GLW:
$2.10
BHP:
9.84
GLW:
89.34
BHP:
2.72
GLW:
2.17
BHP:
1.98
GLW:
9.91
BHP:
4.23
GLW:
13.70
BHP:
$107.64B
GLW:
$16.32B
BHP:
$89.04B
GLW:
$5.93B
BHP:
$52.23B
GLW:
$3.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHP vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank
BHP
GLW
BHP vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group (BHP) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BHP | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.65 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 11.99 | -8.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.16 | 39.68 | -25.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BHP | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 4.97 | -2.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 1.07 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.83 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.26 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BHP vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and GLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHP | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.22% | -99.02% | +22.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.80% | -23.01% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.21% | -27.57% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.21% | -34.52% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.29% | -48.80% | +4.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.14% | -9.82% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.29% | -50.52% | +29.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.38% | 6.94% | -1.56% |
Volatility
BHP vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BHP Group (BHP) is 12.75%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 26.26%. This indicates that BHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHP | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.75% | 26.26% | -13.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.95% | 49.84% | -23.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.73% | 55.59% | -23.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 35.57% | -3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.31% | 33.75% | -1.44% |
Dividends
BHP vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than GLW's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group | 3.18% | 3.64% | 5.98% | 4.98% | 22.44% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.38% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.60% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
Financials
BHP vs. GLW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BHP Group and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BHP vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison
BHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
BHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
BHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BHP and GLW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (26.26%) compared to BHP (12.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHP dropped -76.22% vs GLW's -99.02%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BHP and GLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer