BHDG vs. SOEZ
BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. BHDG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.
Performance
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BHDG
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- -21.72%
- YTD
- -45.57%
- 6M
- -44.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | 0.95% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -29.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHDG and SOEZ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | -0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum SOEZ drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and SOEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHDG | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -56.14% | +41.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -54.26% | +50.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -32.76% | +24.14% |
Volatility
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHDG | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.77% | 70.78% | -43.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 70.78% | -43.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 70.78% | -43.01% |
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BHDG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
BHDG vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison
BHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | 0.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 1.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BHDG and SOEZ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.
SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for BHDG.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BHDG and 0.19% for SOEZ.
Find the right allocation for BHDG and SOEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer