BHDG vs. IBLC
BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BHDG is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions. BHDG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
BHDG vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BHDG
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -4.49%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 21.51%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 46.13%
- 3Y*
- 43.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BHDG vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | 0.95% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 16.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between BHDG and IBLC is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | -0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BHDG vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
BHDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBLC
BHDG vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BHDG | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BHDG vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BHDG | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | -62.54% | +47.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -20.11% | +16.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -25.75% | +17.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.92% | — |
Volatility
BHDG vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BHDG | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 17.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.51% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.77% | 56.05% | -28.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 64.52% | -36.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 64.52% | -36.75% |
BHDG vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BHDG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BHDG vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
BHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.15% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BHDG and IBLC have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 5.15%, compared with 0.00% for BHDG.
They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BHDG and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for BHDG and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer