PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHDG vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHDG vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BHDG

1D
2.19%
1M
9.98%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
-7.51%
6M
-7.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHDG vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BHDG and BFOC is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026

-0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHDG vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BHDG vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHDG vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum BFOC drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHDGBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-18.41%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-18.31%

+14.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.62%

-12.87%

+4.25%

Volatility

BHDG vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHDGBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.77%

12.28%

+15.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.77%

12.28%

+15.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.77%

12.28%

+15.49%

BHDG vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHDG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BHDG vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BHDG nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BHDG and BFOC have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.

BHDG and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BHDG is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BHDG and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHDG and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer