BHDG vs. BCDF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. BHDG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

BHDG vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BHDG

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 9.98%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -11.95%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: -4.32%
• 1Y: 0.69%
• 3Y*: 13.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHDG vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF	0.95%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	-5.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BHDG and BCDF is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026	-0.43

Return for Risk

BHDG vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 9
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHDG vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BHDG	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.02	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.06	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.18	—

Drawdowns

BHDG vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHDG and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BHDG	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.06%	-27.70%	+12.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.95%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.89%	-11.95%	+8.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.62%	-9.80%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BHDG	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.77%	15.19%	+12.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.77%	16.95%	+10.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.77%	16.95%	+10.82%

BHDG vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHDG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BHDG vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

BHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.57%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BHDG and BCDF in my portfolio?

BHDG and BCDF have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BHDG or BCDF?

On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BHDG or BCDF?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BHDG or BCDF?

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for BHDG.

What is the main difference between BHDG and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BHDG and 0.85% for BCDF.