BGVIX vs. YFSNX
BGVIX (Brandes Global Equity Fund) and YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGVIX returned 12.45%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for YFSNX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGVIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for YFSNX.
Performance
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGVIX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 22.30% return.
BGVIX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
YFSNX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 22.30%
- 6M
- 24.62%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | 1.68% | 33.72% | 12.53% | 21.71% | -5.97% | 21.20% | 1.97% | 17.38% | -10.39% | 14.07% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 22.30% | 14.79% | -0.47% | 16.48% | -9.39% | 13.00% | 18.32% | 24.48% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGVIX and YFSNX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGVIX and YFSNX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGVIX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank
BGVIX
YFSNX
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGVIX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.56 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.77 | 4.84 | +2.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGVIX drawdown since its inception was -41.16%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGVIX and YFSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGVIX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.16% | -35.14% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -14.09% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.22% | -14.29% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -25.26% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -4.55% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -4.93% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.51% | -1.88% |
Volatility
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brandes Global Equity Fund (BGVIX) is 3.61%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that BGVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGVIX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 6.69% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 21.31% | -12.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 21.83% | -9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 15.54% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 16.29% | +1.12% |
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGVIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGVIX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison
BGVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGVIX Brandes Global Equity Fund | 12.20% | 12.41% | 9.13% | 4.80% | 3.31% | 6.00% | 2.98% | 2.46% | 6.99% | 4.02% | 2.07% | 8.51% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 4.33% | 8.06% | 4.71% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGVIX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSNX has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to BGVIX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGVIX dropped -41.16% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.
BGVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGVIX and YFSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer