BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO
BGU.TO (Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF) and ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) are both exchange-traded funds - BGU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bristol Gate, while ZDY.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGU.TO returned 9.27%/yr vs 11.14%/yr for ZDY.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGU.TO achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than ZDY.TO's 17.03% return.
BGU.TO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 12.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
ZDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 13.43%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGU.TO Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF | 7.16% | 4.62% | 18.85% | 20.28% | -13.23% | 30.22% | 8.27% | 30.25% | 2.31% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 17.03% | -0.87% | 26.24% | 4.58% | 1.64% | 22.92% | -5.18% | 16.94% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGU.TO and ZDY.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between BGU.TO and ZDY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGU.TO
ZDY.TO
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) and BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGU.TO | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 1.26 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 3.23 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGU.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ZDY.TO drawdown of -32.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGU.TO and ZDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGU.TO | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -32.99% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -11.53% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.03% | -15.33% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -15.33% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -2.14% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -3.40% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 4.49% | -0.51% |
Volatility
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) at 2.26%. This indicates that BGU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGU.TO | ZDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 2.26% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 8.66% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 12.90% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 12.44% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 15.27% | +3.08% |
Dividends
BGU.TO vs. ZDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGU.TO Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 1.51% | 1.80% | 1.97% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 2.33% | 3.65% | 3.02% | 2.80% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGU.TO and ZDY.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ZDY.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Bristol Gate and BMO.
Find the right allocation for BGU.TO and ZDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer