PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGSIX vs. SLMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional (BGSIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGSIX achieves a 35.26% return, which is significantly lower than SLMCX's 53.68% return. Over the past 10 years, BGSIX has underperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 25.83%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 28.24% annualized return.


BGSIX

1D
-5.96%
1M
2.70%
YTD
35.26%
6M
33.60%
1Y
52.42%
3Y*
37.26%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
25.83%

SLMCX

1D
-3.48%
1M
4.60%
YTD
53.68%
6M
50.82%
1Y
107.41%
3Y*
45.46%
5Y*
24.95%
10Y*
28.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGSIX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional
35.26%19.92%40.31%49.49%-42.99%8.45%86.73%44.23%2.24%49.89%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
53.68%37.32%26.67%44.27%-31.14%38.97%44.45%54.15%-8.12%34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BGSIX and SLMCX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2000

0.90

The correlation between BGSIX and SLMCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGSIX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGSIX
BGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SLMCX
SLMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SLMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional (BGSIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGSIXSLMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.58

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

9.22

-6.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

33.49

-24.62

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the SLMCX Sharpe Ratio of 4.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGSIX and SLMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGSIX drawdown since its inception was -73.48%, which is greater than SLMCX's maximum drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGSIX and SLMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGSIXSLMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.48%

-68.10%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.42%

-12.33%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.73%

-29.13%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.11%

-37.32%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.11%

-37.32%

-11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-3.48%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.37%

-12.98%

-12.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

3.38%

+2.92%

Volatility

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional (BGSIX) has a higher volatility of 15.70% compared to Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) at 12.01%. This indicates that BGSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGSIXSLMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.70%

12.01%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.45%

21.88%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.54%

28.00%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.45%

26.62%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.23%

26.28%

-0.05%

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGSIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMCX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGSIX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison

BGSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%, more than SLMCX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGSIX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Institutional
8.99%12.16%7.82%0.00%0.00%7.12%4.47%1.39%1.15%7.72%1.10%0.00%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund
6.15%9.45%14.27%5.16%9.42%11.75%10.40%11.44%12.33%11.15%8.19%10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGSIX and SLMCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGSIX has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to SLMCX (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGSIX dropped -73.48% vs SLMCX's -68.10%.

SLMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.06 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGSIX and SLMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer