BGS vs. DE
BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) and DE (Deere & Company) are both stocks. BGS operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while DE operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BGS returned -15.67%/yr vs 24.02%/yr for DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BGS vs. DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGS achieves a -8.69% return, which is significantly lower than DE's 28.95% return. Over the past 10 years, BGS has underperformed DE with an annualized return of -15.67%, while DE has yielded a comparatively higher 24.02% annualized return.
BGS
- 1D
- -2.83%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -8.69%
- 6M
- -9.11%
- 1Y
- 3.05%
- 3Y*
- -27.86%
- 5Y*
- -28.68%
- 10Y*
- -15.67%
DE
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 28.95%
- 6M
- 28.51%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 24.02%
BGS vs. DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | -8.69% | -26.81% | -28.30% | 0.33% | -60.70% | 17.69% | 67.73% | -31.93% | -12.20% | -15.46% |
DE Deere & Company | 28.95% | 11.39% | 7.56% | -5.48% | 26.59% | 28.86% | 57.96% | 18.30% | -2.90% | 54.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGS and DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2007 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
BGS:
-$0.96
DE:
$17.76
BGS:
0.17
DE:
3.53
BGS:
$1.81B
DE:
$46.01B
BGS:
$388.44M
DE:
$16.40B
BGS:
$91.70M
DE:
$11.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGS vs. DE — Risk / Return Rank
BGS
DE
BGS vs. DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Deere & Company (DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGS | DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.82 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.25 | 1.69 | -1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGS vs. DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGS drawdown since its inception was -86.50%, which is greater than DE's maximum drawdown of -73.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGS and DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGS | DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.50% | -73.27% | -13.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.11% | -19.90% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.36% | -21.59% | -45.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -33.81% | -50.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.50% | -37.91% | -48.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.98% | -9.38% | -75.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.12% | -18.61% | -13.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.11% | 9.70% | +2.41% |
Volatility
BGS vs. DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) is 9.25%, while Deere & Company (DE) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that BGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGS | DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.25% | 10.30% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.94% | 24.38% | +9.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.39% | 29.98% | +21.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 29.36% | +19.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 30.41% | +15.93% |
Dividends
BGS vs. DE - Dividend Comparison
BGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.11%, more than DE's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGS B&G Foods, Inc. | 20.11% | 17.67% | 11.03% | 7.24% | 14.48% | 6.18% | 6.85% | 10.60% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 3.94% | 3.94% |
DE Deere & Company | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.75% | 1.84% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 3.15% |
Financials
BGS vs. DE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between B&G Foods, Inc. and Deere & Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGS vs. DE - Profitability Comparison
BGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.89M and revenue of 408.94M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.5%.
DE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a gross profit of 3.33B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.
BGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of -10.96M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.7%.
DE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
BGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B&G Foods, Inc. reported a net income of -32.54M and revenue of 408.94M, resulting in a net margin of -8.0%.
DE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BGS and DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DE has higher volatility (10.30%) compared to BGS (9.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGS dropped -86.50% vs DE's -73.27%.
DE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGS and DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer