BGRWX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Barrett Growth Fund (BGRWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
BGRWX is managed by Barrett. It was launched on Dec 29, 1998. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRWX Barrett Growth Fund | -10.04% | 8.11% | 28.38% | 32.94% | -24.83% | 21.22% | 28.96% | 31.99% | -0.46% | -0.60% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.81% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BGRWX having a -10.04% return and SWLGX slightly higher at -9.81%.
BGRWX
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- 2.63%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
SWLGX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRWX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGRWX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
BGRWX
SWLGX
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrett Growth Fund (BGRWX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGRWX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 0.83 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.37 | 1.35 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 1.17 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.93 | 4.02 | -3.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGRWX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.83 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.70 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRWX and SWLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
BGRWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.10%, more than SWLGX's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRWX Barrett Growth Fund | 13.10% | 11.78% | 10.42% | 3.01% | 22.03% | 11.98% | 6.78% | 2.43% | 3.49% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.15% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.51% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRWX drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRWX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRWX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.87% | -32.69% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -16.16% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.69% | -32.69% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -13.03% | -1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -7.13% | -10.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 4.69% | -0.60% |
Volatility
BGRWX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Barrett Growth Fund (BGRWX) is 5.07%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that BGRWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGRWX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 6.73% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 12.40% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 22.57% | -4.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 21.52% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 22.81% | -4.02% |