BGRO vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BGRO (BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BGRO is actively managed, while QWLD is passively managed. Over the past year, BGRO returned 13.92% vs 19.11% for QWLD. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

BGRO vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF (BGRO) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGRO achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 9.39% return.

BGRO

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -0.79%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 8.91%
• 1Y: 13.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.33%

QWLD

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 6.46%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 11.57%
• ALL TIME*: 10.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BGRO BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF	$7.79K	$25.19K	$34.77K
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	$231.12K	$297.84K	$1.04M

BGRO vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BGRO BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF	8.91%	12.37%	11.06%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	9.39%	17.93%	4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BGRO and QWLD is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.64

The correlation between BGRO and QWLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

BGRO vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BGRO	QWLD
Technology	51.5%	24.9%
Industrials	16.9%	10.9%
Communication Services	10.4%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	6.3%
Real Estate	4.2%	1.0%
Healthcare	3.2%	13.2%
Energy	2.5%	3.4%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.5%
Financial Services	1.4%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	8.1%
Utilities	-	3.8%

Return for Risk

BGRO vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BGRO

BGRO Risk / Return Rank: 24
BGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
BGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
BGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
BGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 80
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BGRO vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF (BGRO) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BGRO	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.93	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	2.75	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	2.44	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.97	10.67	-8.71

BGRO vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGRO and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BGRO vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGRO drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, smaller than the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRO and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGRO	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.94%	-31.89%	+6.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.64%	-7.66%	-9.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.19%	0.00%	-6.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-3.66%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.76%	1.75%	+4.01%

Volatility

BGRO vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF (BGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that BGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGRO	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.02%	2.30%	+3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	7.73%	+8.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.92%	9.71%	+10.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.57%	13.51%	+10.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	15.12%	+8.45%

BGRO vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGRO vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

BGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than QWLD's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGRO BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.79%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGRO and QWLD in my portfolio?

BGRO and QWLD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGRO or QWLD?

BGRO has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRO dropped -24.94% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, BGRO or QWLD?

On 1-year performance, QWLD leads with 19.11% vs 13.92% for BGRO. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BGRO or QWLD?

Over the 1-year period, QWLD has performed better with a 19.11% return vs 13.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGRO or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGRO or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.03% for BGRO.

What is the main difference between BGRO and QWLD?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BGRO and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.