BGRO vs. QQQA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BGRO (BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. BGRO is actively managed, while QQQA is passively managed. Over the past year, BGRO returned 24.69% vs 86.88% for QQQA. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGRO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.

Performance

BGRO vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF (BGRO) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGRO achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 64.12% return.

BGRO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 7.41%
• YTD: 13.75%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 24.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQA

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 19.04%
• YTD: 64.12%
• 6M: 67.24%
• 1Y: 86.88%
• 3Y*: 34.14%
• 5Y*: 14.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGRO vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BGRO BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF	13.75%	12.37%	10.92%
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	64.12%	9.87%	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between BGRO and QQQA is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.81

The correlation between BGRO and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

BGRO vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BGRO	QQQA
Technology	50.8%	65.2%
Industrials	13.8%	-
Communication Services	11.8%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	4.2%
Healthcare	5.3%	7.8%
Real Estate	3.3%	-
Financial Services	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	-
Energy	0.9%	9.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BGRO vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGRO

BGRO Risk / Return Rank: 35
BGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
BGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
BGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 32

QQQA

QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 90
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGRO vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF (BGRO) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGRO	QQQA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	3.35	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	3.94	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.53	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	6.01	-4.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.71	22.45	-17.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGRO vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGRO and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGRO	QQQA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	3.35	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.58	+0.24

Drawdowns

BGRO vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGRO drawdown since its inception was -24.94%, smaller than the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRO and QQQA.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGRO	QQQA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.94%	-38.44%	+13.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.64%	-14.54%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-0.76%	-1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-15.66%	+10.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.26%	3.88%	+1.38%

Volatility

BGRO vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF (BGRO) is 4.93%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that BGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGRO	QQQA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.93%	10.13%	-5.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	22.18%	-7.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.17%	26.07%	-7.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.54%	25.82%	-2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	25.76%	-2.22%

BGRO vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGRO vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

BGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than QQQA's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGRO BlackRock Large Cap Growth ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	0.06%	0.10%	0.09%	0.34%	0.28%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGRO and QQQA in my portfolio?

BGRO and QQQA have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGRO or QQQA?

QQQA has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to BGRO (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGRO dropped -24.94% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

Which ETF is better, BGRO or QQQA?

On 1-year performance, QQQA leads with 86.88% vs 24.69% for BGRO. On fees, BGRO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BGRO has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BGRO or QQQA?

Over the 1-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 86.88% return vs 24.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BGRO or QQQA?

BGRO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BGRO or QQQA?

QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.03% for BGRO.

What is the main difference between BGRO and QQQA?

BGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BGRO and 0.58% for QQQA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.